<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft AntiSpy vs Symantec Norton Anti-Virus&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://www.humilify.com/wp/technology/by-joecm/microsoft-antispy-vs-symantec-norton-anti-virus/</link>
	<description>Humilfy.com is a bunch of random items</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 03:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: rwcmick</title>
		<link>http://www.humilify.com/wp/technology/by-joecm/microsoft-antispy-vs-symantec-norton-anti-virus/#comment-6</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 05:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.humilify.com/wp/technology/by-joecm/microsoft-antispy-vs-symantec-norton-anti-virus/#comment-6</guid>
					<description>I can't let this one go by without complaining about Symantec.  SAV corporate edition 10.x has been a royal pain in the keister--first it was the startup scans, something they partially fixed with a later rev. but still not all clients seem to listed to the server and go about quarantining items marked as excluded.  SAV 10 tested fine in a lab environment, but in the real world it has proven to be a problem child.

BTW glad to see more stories being posted!  Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t let this one go by without complaining about Symantec.  SAV corporate edition 10.x has been a royal pain in the keister&#8211;first it was the startup scans, something they partially fixed with a later rev. but still not all clients seem to listed to the server and go about quarantining items marked as excluded.  SAV 10 tested fine in a lab environment, but in the real world it has proven to be a problem child.</p>
<p>BTW glad to see more stories being posted!  Keep up the good work.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
